
The Digital Divide
Here you will find the collection of articles on the Digital Divide. This is of particular interest to me as I live in the countryside in one of the smallest exchanges in the UK, which gives me an insight into what is not possible because of the Digital Divide.
This catgegory occasionally overspills into general Ofcom related matters but further network related issues are dealt with in the NGNs section of the directory. The icons should give you a view of the type of content you are likely to find. Please see below for the key.
|
Date & Title
|
Contents
|
Content Type
|
2nd July 2007
More on the Digital Divide |
- Follow up piece covering some of the comments made on the initial post
- Line length charts and estimates of speeds
- Is it a social or a commercial problem?
|

|
29th June 2007
The Digital Divide |
- Is there a right to broadband?
- Capitalism vs Subsidy? Depends on social utility
- Issues with alternative access deployments
|

|
19th June 2007
The Broadband Dividend |
- What is the economic value of broadband to a nation?
- Do the intangibles demand intervention?
- Estimates on dividend from other countries
|

|
12th June 2007
Is Ofcom losing its way? |
- Review of comments made by Peter Luff, MP
- Political decisions being made by quangoes?
- Where does Ofcom play? Should they merge with Openreach?
|
|
29th May 2007
The politics of broadband |
- Two tier pricing: a nail in the coffin of the idealist
- Commercial reality of the market - winning ugly
- Ofcom "understands the dilemna"...
|
|
17th May 2007
£2.5bn or FTTH? |
- BT pays dividend instead of saving for FTTH
- Competition are behind and will not fill gap
- Why invest when risk is high and RoI poor?
|
|
16th April 2007
BSG: Lost in Translation |
- Headlines demand £10bn subsidy for 90% coverage
- What about the other 10%? The Digital Divide?
- Give the market a chance. Distortion could be fatal
|

|
The Digital Divide is still a philosophical debate because there is no clear evidence of economic disadvantage caused by the lack of broadband. People can still move home to where faster speeds are available if it is that important. Their "business case" will stack up, even if houses are more expensive where they need to be.
The Digital Divide theory alternatively relies on there being a basic need for broadband - a right to high speed access - because critical government services can only be accessed via high speed connections. If / when this happens, there may be validity in this argument, but we are not yet close to such a scenario being reality.
Neverthless, as with all good philosophical debates, the subject is broad enough and deep enough to be of interest to many people. I hope you find the articles thought-provoking!


|